GitaChapter 9Verse 5

Gita 9.5

Raja Vidya Raja Guhya Yoga

न च मत्स्थानि भूतानि पश्य मे योगमैश्वरम् । भूतभृन्न च भूतस्थो ममात्मा भूतभावनः ॥

na ca mat-sthāni bhūtāni paśya me yogam aiśvaram | bhūta-bhṛn na ca bhūta-stho mamātmā bhūta-bhāvanaḥ ||

In essence: Behold the supreme paradox: I sustain all beings yet remain untouched by them - the ocean holds the wave but is not held by it.

A conversation between a seeker and guide to help you feel this verse deeply

Sadhak-Guru Dialogue

Sadhak: "But this contradicts what Krishna just said! First everything is in Him, now nothing is in Him. Which is true?"

Guru: "Both are true - that's exactly the point. Tell me, when you dream at night, where do all the dream objects exist?"

Sadhak: "In my mind, I suppose. In my consciousness during sleep."

Guru: "Good. And yet, does any dream object actually occupy space in your mind? Can you find a dream mountain taking up room in your brain?"

Sadhak: "No... the dream objects feel real but they don't have actual substance. They appear in consciousness but consciousness isn't 'full' of them."

Guru: "Exactly. The dream world exists IN you, yet doesn't really rest in you. You contain it without being a container. You sustain it without being affected by it. This is a small taste of what Krishna describes."

Sadhak: "But in the dream I'm affected! If there's a dream tiger, I feel fear."

Guru: "The dream-you feels fear. But the sleeper lying in bed - is that person actually in danger? When you wake up, did the tiger ever touch the real you?"

Sadhak: "No. The sleeper was always safe, always untouched. Only the dream character was affected."

Guru: "Now you glimpse the divine yoga. Krishna as Brahman is like the sleeper - the entire universe is His dream. He 'sustains' it all, gives it apparent reality, yet is never actually touched by any of it. And here's the secret - you too are that sleeper, not the dream character you take yourself to be."

Sadhak: "If I'm the untouched witness, why do I feel so bound and suffering?"

Guru: "Because you're identified with the dream character instead of resting as the dreamer. That's the only 'bondage' - a case of mistaken identity. Krishna shows His divine yoga so you might recognize your own."

Did this resonate with you? Share it with someone who needs to hear this.

🌅 Daily Practice

🌅 Morning

Upon waking, before engaging with the day, spend a few moments noticing the transition from dream to waking. Reflect: 'I was just sustaining an entire dream world - people, places, events - yet none of it was actually IN me. The same consciousness now sustains this waking world. Today I practice remembering: I contain all experiences without being a container; I sustain all that arises without being affected.' Let this set the tone for a day of engaged detachment.

☀️ Daytime

When caught up in strong emotions or stressful situations, pause and apply the paradox to yourself: 'This experience is appearing in my awareness. Yet where exactly is it? Can I find where awareness ends and the experience begins? Like Krishna, I am bhūta-bhṛt (sustaining this moment) yet not bhūta-stha (not actually lodged in or damaged by it).' This isn't denial of experience but recognition of your true relationship to it.

🌙 Evening

Before sleep, review the day's experiences without judgment: all the thoughts, encounters, successes, failures. Then recognize: 'All of this appeared in awareness. None of it could exist apart from consciousness. Yet consciousness itself - what I truly am - remains exactly as it was before any experience arose. Tomorrow's experiences will be the same.' Fall asleep contemplating the divine yoga: presence that holds all while being held by nothing.

Common Questions

This sounds like word games. How can something both be and not be in God simultaneously?
This isn't wordplay but pointing to a reality beyond the mind's either/or logic. Consider: does your reflection exist in the mirror? In one sense yes - you can see it there. In another sense no - there's no actual person inside the glass. The reflection depends entirely on you yet doesn't truly occupy or affect the mirror. Similarly, the universe 'exists' in Brahman as appearance, not as substance. Brahman is the 'mirror' in which all appears, which 'holds' all images yet is never touched by any image. Logic breaks down here because logic operates within the dream; this verse points beyond the dream.
If God doesn't really contain beings, how is He responsible for them? How does He 'sustain' what isn't really in Him?
The sustaining is through the power of consciousness to make things appear real. Think of a movie screen - it 'sustains' every scene by providing the ground for projection, yet no bullet hole, fire, or explosion ever marks the screen. The screen is entirely responsible for the movie being visible while remaining completely unaffected by movie events. Krishna sustains beings by being the awareness in which they appear, the existence by which they exist, the reality that makes illusion possible. He is more intimate to each being than their own heartbeat, yet more untouched than the farthest star.
What practical difference does this paradox make? Why should I care about this abstract philosophy?
Because you ARE this paradox. You are consciousness in which thoughts, emotions, and experiences appear. They seem to be 'in' you, affecting you deeply. Yet upon careful investigation, can any thought actually touch awareness itself? Has any experience ever modified the witness? Understanding this verse reveals your own nature as the unaffected awareness - not philosophically but experientially. Suffering arises from believing you're a container filled with painful contents; liberation comes from recognizing you're the space in which all contents arise and dissolve, never actually held or holding.