GitaChapter 9Verse 4

Gita 9.4

Raja Vidya Raja Guhya Yoga

मया ततमिदं सर्वं जगदव्यक्तमूर्तिना | मत्स्थानि सर्वभूतानि न चाहं तेष्ववस्थितः ||४||

mayā tatam idaṁ sarvaṁ jagad avyakta-mūrtinā | mat-sthāni sarva-bhūtāni na cāhaṁ teṣv avasthitaḥ ||4||

In essence: I fill everything yet nothing contains Me - like space pervading all objects while being touched by none, the Divine is everywhere without being anywhere in particular.

A conversation between a seeker and guide to help you feel this verse deeply

Sadhak-Guru Dialogue

Sadhak: "This sounds like a contradiction. 'I pervade everything' but 'I am not in them.' How can both be true?"

Guru: "Consider space. Does space pervade this room?"

Sadhak: "Yes, it pervades everything in the room."

Guru: "And if the room is painted red, does space become red?"

Sadhak: "No, space has no color."

Guru: "So space pervades the red room but the redness is not in space. Space allows the room without being modified by the room. Is this a contradiction?"

Sadhak: "No, I see - space is in everything but nothing is in space in the sense of affecting it. But can consciousness really be like space?"

Guru: "Is there any experience you've ever had that wasn't pervaded by awareness?"

Sadhak: "No... every experience implies awareness."

Guru: "And when you had a nightmare, did awareness become frightened? When you had a happy dream, did awareness become happy?"

Sadhak: "The content was frightening or happy, but... the awareness witnessing it..."

Guru: "Was simply aware. Unmodified. Pervading the experience without being affected by it. This is what Krishna means. The Divine pervades all experiences while remaining untouched by their qualities."

Sadhak: "But I feel affected by my experiences. I am not untouched!"

Guru: "Who feels affected?"

Sadhak: "I do... the mind, the ego?"

Guru: "And the mind and ego are objects appearing in awareness. The sufferer is part of the content, not the awareness itself. You, as awareness, have never been touched by any experience. You have only believed yourself to be the content rather than the space in which content appears."

Sadhak: "This is dizzying. Am I the sufferer or the awareness?"

Guru: "Right now, in this very dizziness - what is aware of being dizzy?"

Did this resonate with you? Share it with someone who needs to hear this.

🌅 Daily Practice

🌅 Morning

Upon waking, before any thought solidifies, notice the space of awareness in which thoughts will appear. This space is the 'avyakta-mūrti' - the unmanifest form that pervades all. Rest in this spaciousness before engaging with the day's content. Set the intention: 'Today I remember that I am the space in which experience appears, not merely the content of experience.'

☀️ Daytime

When challenging situations arise, practice the 'space meditation': instead of focusing on the problem, notice the awareness in which the problem appears. The problem exists in awareness; awareness is not in the problem. This shift from content to context immediately changes your relationship to difficulty - you're no longer trapped inside it but holding it in the vast space of consciousness.

🌙 Evening

As you prepare for sleep, contemplate: 'All today's experiences - the pleasant and unpleasant, the successes and failures - all appeared in me. I pervaded them all while remaining untouched by any of them.' Let this recognition dissolve the accumulation of the day's impressions. Sleep as the awareness that held the day rather than as the person who lived it.

Common Questions

If the Divine pervades everything, why do we experience separation from God?
The experience of separation is itself pervaded by that from which you feel separate. This is the great irony: even the sense of being distant from the Divine happens within the Divine. Separation is an experience, and all experience occurs in consciousness. The feeling of separation is a content appearing in the ever-present awareness, like a dream of being lost appearing in the mind of the sleeper who never left their bed. You can never actually be separate; you can only dream separation.
What is the practical difference between 'God pervades all' and pantheism (God IS all)?
Pantheism says God is identical with the totality of things - the sum total of the universe is God. This creates problems: if God is only the universe, God is limited; if you destroy part of the universe, you destroy part of God. Krishna's teaching is different: God pervades all without being limited to all. The universe exists in God, but God transcends the universe. All things are in God; God is not in things in the sense of being limited by them. This preserves both immanence (God everywhere) and transcendence (God beyond everything).
If 'all beings exist in Me' but Krishna is not in them, doesn't that make God indifferent to our suffering?
Being untouched by suffering is not the same as being indifferent to it. A parent may be deeply concerned about a child's nightmare while not personally experiencing the fear. The Divine's 'not being in things' means the Divine is not limited, contaminated, or bound by what happens in manifestation - not that the Divine doesn't care. In fact, the Gita repeatedly emphasizes divine love and the longing for souls to recognize their true nature. The non-involvement is in identity, not in compassion.