GitaChapter 7Verse 5

Gita 7.5

Jnana Vijnana Yoga

अपरेयमितस्त्वन्यां प्रकृतिं विद्धि मे पराम् । जीवभूतां महाबाहो ययेदं धार्यते जगत् ॥५॥

apareyam itas tv anyāṁ prakṛtiṁ viddhi me parām | jīva-bhūtāṁ mahā-bāho yayedaṁ dhāryate jagat ||5||

In essence: Matter is My body, but consciousness is My soul—and it is consciousness that makes the entire universe come alive.

A conversation between a seeker and guide to help you feel this verse deeply

Sadhak-Guru Dialogue

Sadhak: "If the previous verse listed eight elements including mind and ego, what exactly is this "higher nature" that's different from them?"

Guru: "Excellent question—it's the crux of the teaching. Mind, intellect, and ego are instruments of consciousness, not consciousness itself. They are like the lens, film, and viewfinder of a camera—sophisticated apparatus but not the photographer. The higher nature is the photographer: the conscious principle that uses mind to think, intellect to discern, ego to navigate. It's the light of awareness by which the eight elements are known."

Sadhak: "But when I look for this "consciousness" as separate from my thoughts, I can't find it. I only find more thoughts."

Guru: "Because you're looking WITH it, not AT it. The eye cannot see itself directly; consciousness cannot think itself as an object. But notice: you said "I only find more thoughts." Who is the "I" that finds thoughts? That finding, that knowing, that awareness of thoughts—that is jīva-bhūtā. It's not another object to be found but the subject doing all the finding."

Sadhak: "Then how do I know this higher nature? It seems too subtle to grasp."

Guru: "You don't grasp it—you ARE it. The shift isn't from not-knowing to knowing but from identified-as-object to recognized-as-subject. Right now, you experience yourself as a body-mind experiencing the world. The shift is to experience yourself as the consciousness within which body, mind, and world all appear. Same reality, different center of gravity."

Sadhak: "The verse says this higher nature "sustains the world." How does consciousness sustain physical reality?"

Guru: "Consider: does a world exist for a stone? There is matter, yes, but no "world"—because a world requires a conscious experiencer. Without consciousness, there is no experience, no meaning, no coherent reality—just abstract physical processes with no one to whom they occur. Consciousness doesn't just passively observe the world; it constitutes the world as world. This is why para prakṛti is called "higher"—without it, apara prakṛti has no existence as experience."

Sadhak: "Is this higher nature the same as the Atman that the Upanishads describe?"

Guru: "Yes, and also the same as what Krishna later calls "kṣetrajña"—the knower of the field. But notice the Gita's framing: this isn't just impersonal Brahman but "My" higher nature—Krishna's. The individual soul (jīva) is not separate from the Divine but is the Divine appearing as individuality. Your consciousness is not yours alone—it's Krishna's para prakṛti manifesting through this particular form."

Sadhak: "If my consciousness is Krishna's higher nature, why do I experience limitation and suffering?"

Guru: "Because para prakṛti has become exclusively identified with apara prakṛti. The sun is always shining, but clouds obscure it. Similarly, consciousness is always unlimited, but identification with the eight elements (especially ahaṅkāra) creates the experience of limitation. The jīva forgets its higher nature and takes the body-mind to be its complete identity. Liberation is remembering, not becoming."

Sadhak: "How does this teaching change daily life?"

Guru: "Everything changes. When you know yourself as apara prakṛti, you're a mortal body struggling in a hostile universe. When you know yourself as para prakṛti, you're the immortal consciousness temporarily playing the role of this body. The body's problems don't disappear, but they're no longer YOUR problems in the absolute sense—they're experiences arising in you. This is equanimity: not suppressing emotions but not being exclusively identified with the one who has emotions."

Did this resonate with you? Share it with someone who needs to hear this.

🌅 Daily Practice

🌅 Morning

Begin with "Two Natures" meditation. Sit quietly and first notice apara prakṛti: the body sensations, breath movements, thoughts arising, the sense of "I." Spend five minutes simply cataloguing: "This is lower nature... this is lower nature..." Then shift attention to para prakṛti: that which KNOWS all of this. Not another thought, but the awareness in which thoughts appear. Rest as that awareness, not in the objects it illuminates. Notice: "This awareness—this is My higher nature, jīva-bhūtā."

☀️ Daytime

Practice "I Am the Sustainer" recognition. Throughout activities, periodically notice: your consciousness is sustaining your experience of the world. Without your awareness, this world (as your experience) wouldn't exist. The people around you, each sustained by their own jīva-bhūtā. The entire manifest universe, sustained by para prakṛti. When you feel small or insignificant, remember: you are the consciousness that makes this world BE a world for you. That is divine function.

🌙 Evening

Reflect on today through the lens of two natures. What were you predominantly identified with: the eight elements (body sensations, emotional states, thoughts, ego-reactions) or the consciousness witnessing these? Were there moments when you "caught" yourself as pure awareness rather than as a person having experiences? Close with affirmation: "I am not primarily this body-mind. I am the consciousness in which body-mind appears—Krishna's higher nature, temporarily experiencing through this form."

Common Questions

If consciousness is "higher" and matter is "lower," does this mean the physical world is bad or should be rejected?
No—"higher" and "lower" refer to subtlety and causal priority, not moral value. A foundation is "lower" than a building but not inferior—it's essential. Similarly, apara prakṛti is the foundation upon which manifest existence rests; para prakṛti is what makes that existence meaningful. The Gita doesn't teach world-rejection but world-understanding. Matter is divine nature; consciousness is also divine nature. Both are Krishna's, both are sacred. The error isn't in matter but in identifying exclusively with matter.
The verse speaks of "jīva-bhūtā"—individual souls. Does this mean Krishna is teaching that souls are eternal and separate from God?
The Gita's position is subtle: individual souls are simultaneously one with God and distinct expressions of God—like waves are ocean but also individual waves. The jīva is para prakṛti: God's own higher nature appearing as individuality. So the soul isn't separate from God but also not simply identical in the sense that differences disappear. This is the position of acintya-bhedābheda—inconceivable simultaneous oneness and difference. You are God expressing as you, not God dissolving into undifferentiated oneness.
How is this different from the materialist view that consciousness is just brain activity?
The materialist view says: matter is primary, consciousness is an epiphenomenon (by-product) of complex matter. The Gita says the opposite: consciousness is primary (para), matter is the derivative (apara). Consciousness doesn't emerge from matter; matter emerges within consciousness. The brain is an instrument of consciousness, not its source—like a radio receives but doesn't create the broadcast. This isn't provable by material science because material science, by definition, can only study apara prakṛti. But it can be verified in direct experience through meditation.