GitaChapter 7Verse 27

Gita 7.27

Jnana Vijnana Yoga

इच्छाद्वेषसमुत्थेन द्वन्द्वमोहेन भारत । सर्वभूतानि संमोहं सर्गे यान्ति परन्तप ॥

icchā-dveṣa-samutthena dvandva-mohena bhārata | sarva-bhūtāni saṁmohaṁ sarge yānti parantapa ||

In essence: From the moment of birth, all beings fall into delusion through the pairs of opposites—desire and aversion—which create the entire structure of human suffering.

A conversation between a seeker and guide to help you feel this verse deeply

Sadhak-Guru Dialogue

Sadhak: "If everyone is born into delusion, doesn't that make awakening almost impossible?"

Guru: "Born into delusion, yes. Born to remain there, no. A fish is born into water but can leap above the surface."

Sadhak: "But the pull of desire and aversion feels so natural, so constant. How can anyone overcome what's there from birth?"

Guru: "You don't overcome it by fighting. You see through it. What is desire at its root?"

Sadhak: "Wanting something I don't have."

Guru: "And beneath that?"

Sadhak: "A feeling of incompleteness, I suppose. A sense that I need something to be whole."

Guru: "Exactly. Desire assumes you're incomplete. Aversion assumes something threatens your completeness. Both rest on the same false premise—that you're a fragment needing to be completed or protected."

Sadhak: "But I do feel incomplete!"

Guru: "The feeling is real; its interpretation is delusion. What if you're actually whole, and the feeling of incompleteness is just the residue of forgetting?"

Sadhak: "Then desire and aversion would lose their urgency."

Guru: "They would. You might still prefer some things to others—preference isn't the problem. But the desperate clinging, the fear-driven avoiding—that would dissolve."

Sadhak: "Is it possible to live without any desire or aversion?"

Guru: "The goal isn't their absence but your freedom from their tyranny. The sage has preferences; they just don't have preferences about their preferences. They act according to what arises without being enslaved by it."

Sadhak: "That sounds like a subtle distinction."

Guru: "It is. The difference between bondage and freedom is subtle—not in the external behavior, often, but in the internal relationship to that behavior. The free being moves through desires and aversions like a bird through sky—touching nothing, bound by nothing."

Did this resonate with you? Share it with someone who needs to hear this.

🌅 Daily Practice

🌅 Morning

Begin with 'Dvandva Recognition' meditation. Sit quietly and notice any wanting arising—for the day to go well, for certain outcomes, for comfort. Don't suppress; just notice: 'This is iccha.' Then notice any not-wanting—resistance to discomfort, to challenge, to uncertainty. 'This is dvesha.' See how these two create your mental weather. Then ask: 'Who is aware of both desire and aversion?' Rest attention there—in the awareness that witnesses the opposites without being either one.

☀️ Daytime

Throughout the day, catch yourself in the grip of dvandva-moha. Notice when you're chasing (desire) or fleeing (aversion). The sign is internal contraction, urgency, reactivity. When caught, pause and label: 'Desire is present' or 'Aversion is present.' This simple naming creates space between you and the movement. You're no longer the desire; you're the one who sees the desire. This small gap is the beginning of freedom.

🌙 Evening

Reflect on today's desires and aversions. List the main ones—what you wanted, what you resisted. Then examine: 'Did fulfilling desires bring lasting satisfaction? Did avoiding aversions bring lasting peace?' Usually both are temporary. The chase continues tomorrow. Ask: 'What if I responded to tomorrow's dvandva from wholeness rather than lack? What would that look like?' Visualize moving through situations without the desperate clinging or fearful avoiding. This isn't indifference but the engaged freedom of one who knows they're already complete.

Common Questions

If desire and aversion are the problem, should I try to eliminate all preferences and become indifferent to everything?
No—the problem isn't preference but moha (delusion) about preference. Desire in itself is natural and even necessary for life. The issue is being captivated by desire, believing your happiness depends on its fulfillment. A sage might prefer one food to another while being completely undisturbed if they receive neither. The goal is freedom within desire, not the impossible elimination of desire. Indifference isn't liberation—it's often just aversion to aversion.
The verse says this delusion happens 'from birth.' Does that mean we inherit karma or delusion from past lives?
Yes, the Gita teaches continuity across lives. 'Sarge' (at birth/creation) means that beings don't start fresh—they carry tendencies (vasanas) from previous existence. The specific form of your desires and aversions has roots in patterns built over many lifetimes. This isn't fatalistic—these patterns can be transformed. But it explains why some inclinations feel so deep and intractable: they're not just this life's accumulation but long-standing grooves in consciousness.
If desire and aversion create all suffering, why did God create beings with these tendencies? Couldn't existence work without them?
Desire and aversion aren't mistakes but mechanisms of evolution. They drive embodied beings to survive, reproduce, develop. Without them, the cosmic play (lila) couldn't unfold. The 'problem' is only from the individual perspective of suffering; from the cosmic view, the whole drama—including the suffering and the liberation from it—is the Divine's self-expression. The question 'why create this?' assumes God is outside creation. But Krishna says He IS creation. The play of dvandva is the play of the Divine, including the transcendence of dvandva.