GitaChapter 6Verse 9

Gita 6.9

Dhyana Yoga

सुहृन्मित्रार्युदासीनमध्यस्थद्वेष्यबन्धुषु । साधुष्वपि च पापेषु समबुद्धिर्विशिष्यते ॥९॥

suhṛn-mitrāry-udāsīna-madhyastha-dveṣya-bandhuṣu | sādhuṣv api ca pāpeṣu sama-buddhir viśiṣyate ||9||

In essence: The yogi who maintains equal regard toward well-wishers and friends, enemies and neutrals, arbiters and the hateful, relatives and strangers, saints and sinners—that one stands supreme.

A conversation between a seeker and guide to help you feel this verse deeply

Sadhak-Guru Dialogue

Sadhak: "Guruji, this verse asks the impossible! How can I see my enemy the same as my friend? One hurts me, one helps me. They are objectively different."

Guru: "When you sleep and dream, sometimes a dream friend helps you, sometimes a dream enemy attacks. Upon waking, do you maintain different feelings toward them?"

Sadhak: "No, because I realize both were appearances in my own mind."

Guru: "The awakened yogi realizes the same about the waking world. Friend and enemy are both roles in the cosmic dream, both expressions of the one Consciousness playing different parts. Sama-buddhi is the vision of one who has begun to wake up."

Sadhak: "But the pain caused by an enemy is real, not dreamlike! If someone harms my family, how can I have equal regard?"

Guru: "Notice I said 'equal regard,' not 'equal response.' You may still protect your family, even fight if necessary. But can you do so without hatred? Can you see that the enemy, too, is driven by his own pain, his own conditioning, his own ignorance—just as you are driven by yours?"

Sadhak: "That seems like making excuses for bad behavior."

Guru: "Understanding is not excusing. When a doctor treats a violent patient, she may restrain him while recognizing he acts from illness, not evil. Her response is firm but not hateful. Sama-buddhi is this: clear action without the poison of contempt."

Sadhak: "The verse even mentions seeing saints and sinners equally. Surely saints are better than sinners?"

Guru: "Better at what? More pleasant to be around? Usually. More evolved spiritually? Perhaps. But do they possess more of the divine essence than the sinner? Is the sun more present in the clean mirror than the dirty one?"

Sadhak: "No, the sun shines equally, only the reflection differs."

Guru: "The sādhu reflects divine light clearly; the pāpa reflects it distortedly. But the light itself is the same. Sama-buddhi sees the light, not just the reflection. It doesn't mean approving the distortion or pretending the sinner's actions are as beautiful as the saint's. It means recognizing the same consciousness looking out of both pairs of eyes."

Sadhak: "Why does Krishna say such a person 'viśiṣyate'—excels? What makes this the peak of achievement?"

Guru: "Because it demonstrates complete freedom from the ego's most persistent grip: judgment, division, categorization of beings. The ego survives by maintaining 'us versus them,' 'better than' and 'worse than.' When sama-buddhi becomes natural, the ego has lost its favorite game. What remains is pure awareness—no longer a separate self defending its territory, but consciousness recognizing itself everywhere."

Sadhak: "Is this a gradual achievement or a sudden realization?"

Guru: "Both. Gradually, through practice, you extend your circle of compassion—first to loved ones, then to strangers, then to difficult people, finally to those you considered enemies. Suddenly, perhaps, you realize the circle has no edge—it was always infinite. The gradual practice prepares you for sudden recognition. But don't wait for the sudden; work with the gradual. Each time you catch judgment and soften it, you move toward sama-buddhi."

Sadhak: "What about righteous anger at injustice? If I see cruelty, should I remain 'equal-minded' toward the cruel?"

Guru: "Sama-buddhi doesn't mean passivity toward injustice. You can oppose cruelty firmly while recognizing the human being behind the cruel act. Martin Luther King spoke of loving your enemy while resisting their actions. This is sama-buddhi in action—the same regard for the soul, different responses to the behavior. The energy is protective, not hateful. The goal is transformation, not destruction. This is the highest form of opposition."

Did this resonate with you? Share it with someone who needs to hear this.

🌅 Daily Practice

🌅 Morning

Begin with 'Nine-Category Meditation.' Sit quietly and bring to mind one person from each category: a well-wisher (someone who wants your good), a friend, an enemy (someone who opposes you), a neutral person, a mediator figure, someone you find hateful, a family member, someone you consider saintly, someone whose behavior you consider sinful. Visualize each face. Notice your internal response—warmth, coldness, judgment, discomfort. Now, with each face, look for what's common: behind those eyes is awareness, just like behind yours. Each is a conscious being seeking happiness, avoiding suffering, acting from their own conditioning. Let your heart soften equally toward each. You don't condone harmful behavior, but you recognize the common consciousness. End by affirming: 'May I move toward sama-buddhi today.'

☀️ Daytime

Practice 'Catching the Divide' throughout daily interactions. Notice when your mind automatically categorizes someone: 'This person is good/bad,' 'This one is for me/against me,' 'I like/dislike this person.' Each judgment is a departure from sama-buddhi. When you catch it, pause and ask: 'What would sama-buddhi see here?' Not that the person's behavior is fine if it isn't, but that behind this behavior is a being like yourself—confused, seeking, struggling. This doesn't require interaction; it's an internal adjustment. Also practice with difficult people: if you think of someone with resentment, deliberately recognize: 'This person, too, is a conscious being. This person, too, will die. This person, too, wants to be happy.' This is not forgiveness yet—just recognition. Forgiveness may follow.

🌙 Evening

Evening reflection examines the day's practice. Review: 'Toward whom did I maintain sama-buddhi? Toward whom did I lose it?' 'Which category is hardest for me? Enemies? Sinners? The hateful?' Knowing your edge is useful—that's where to focus practice. Then do 'Expanding Circle' meditation. Begin with yourself—wish yourself well. Expand to loved ones, wishing them well. Expand to neutral strangers—wishing them well. Now the challenging part: expand to difficult people, enemies, those you find hateful. Wish them well too—not that their harmful actions succeed, but that they find the peace that would make harmful actions unnecessary. Finally, extend to all beings without exception. Rest in this boundless goodwill. This is sama-buddhi in active form—not mere neutrality but universal compassion that excludes no one.

Common Questions

Doesn't maintaining equal regard for everyone lead to moral relativism? If I see saints and sinners equally, does that mean I believe their actions are equally good?
Absolutely not. Sama-buddhi operates at the level of being, not behavior. The yogi clearly recognizes that kindness produces different results than cruelty, that virtue leads somewhere different than vice. What's equal is the recognition of consciousness itself—the same awareness inhabits saint and sinner. This is ontological equality (equality of being), not moral equality (equality of actions). A mother may see her two children with equal love while clearly recognizing that one child's behavior is skillful and another's is destructive. She responds differently to each, but loves equally. Similarly, sama-buddhi means loving the Self in all while intelligently responding to different expressions.
The nine categories in this verse seem excessive. Isn't the basic teaching simply 'treat everyone equally'?
The extensive list serves a specific purpose: it covers all the ego's favorite exceptions. Most people can be kind to friends but not enemies. Some can be neutral to strangers but not to those who actively hate them. Many accept ordinary sinners but draw the line at certain criminals. By listing suhṛt through pāpa, Krishna closes every escape route. The ego always finds someone to exclude from its compassion. This verse says: no exceptions. The well-wisher who expects nothing and the hateful one who attacks without cause—sama-buddhi toward both. The saint whose presence uplifts and the sinner whose presence disturbs—sama-buddhi toward both. This comprehensiveness is what makes the teaching radical and what makes its practitioner 'viśiṣyate'—distinguished.
How is this different from verse 6.7's teaching about equanimity? Both seem to discuss treating opposites equally.
Verse 6.7 addresses equanimity toward experiences—heat/cold, pleasure/pain, honor/dishonor. It's about how you receive what life brings to you personally. Verse 6.9 extends equanimity to persons—the full spectrum of human relationships. This is subtler and more challenging because people aren't just experiences that pass; they're conscious beings with whom we have ongoing relationships charged with history, expectation, and emotion. Remaining steady in heat and cold is difficult; remaining steady toward one who betrayed you, or who continues to scheme against you, is far harder. Verse 6.9 also explicitly includes the moral dimension (saints/sinners) which 6.7 doesn't address. Together, these verses map complete equanimity: toward all experiences and toward all beings.