GitaChapter 6Verse 32

Gita 6.32

Dhyana Yoga

आत्मौपम्येन सर्वत्र समं पश्यति योऽर्जुन | सुखं वा यदि वा दुःखं स योगी परमो मतः ||३२||

ātmaupamyena sarvatra samaṁ paśyati yo 'rjuna | sukhaṁ vā yadi vā duḥkhaṁ sa yogī paramo mataḥ ||32||

In essence: The supreme yogi sees everyone's pleasure and pain as their own—true empathy born from realizing the same Self in all.

A conversation between a seeker and guide to help you feel this verse deeply

Sadhak-Guru Dialogue

Sadhak: "This seems like an impossible standard. How can I literally feel everyone's pain as my own? Wouldn't that be unbearable—there's so much suffering in the world!"

Guru: "Notice the verse carefully. It says the yogi 'sees equality'—paśyati samam. It's about perception, not about being overwhelmed by everyone's emotional content. When you truly see that another's suffering is the same in nature as yours would be, two things happen: you respond appropriately to help, and you're not destabilized because you see suffering itself as temporary phenomenon within unchanging awareness. The yogi feels universal compassion without drowning in universal misery."

Sadhak: "But if I don't feel others' pain intensely, am I really empathetic? Doesn't true compassion mean suffering with others?"

Guru: "Consider: does a skilled surgeon feel the patient's pain during surgery? They understand it, respect it, work to alleviate it—but they don't writhe with each incision. If they did, they couldn't help. The supreme yogi's empathy is like the surgeon's: deep understanding without incapacitating identification. They feel compassion, not co-suffering. 'Compassion' etymologically means 'suffering with,' but mature compassion means 'understanding suffering so deeply that you can respond helpfully'—not being paralyzed by shared pain."

Sadhak: "'Ātmaupamyena'—through comparison to oneself. But people's experiences are so different from mine. How can I compare their suffering to mine when I haven't experienced what they have?"

Guru: "You're confusing content and structure. You haven't experienced their specific circumstances, but you have experienced suffering. Suffering has a universal structure: it feels like contraction, resistance, the wish for things to be different. When you see someone suffer—whether from poverty, illness, heartbreak, failure—you know the shape of that experience even if the content differs. 'Ātmaupamyena' means recognizing: 'This being, in their circumstances, feels what I feel in mine.' The analogy is at the level of felt experience, not specific situation."

Sadhak: "The verse says this yogi is 'paramo'—supreme, the highest. Is empathy really the highest spiritual attainment? I thought enlightenment was about transcending such emotional responses."

Guru: "Here Krishna reveals something profound: the highest attainment is not cold transcendence but warm understanding. True enlightenment doesn't eliminate empathy; it universalizes it. Before enlightenment, your empathy is limited—strong for loved ones, weak for strangers, absent for enemies. After enlightenment, empathy becomes equal because you recognize the same Self in all. This isn't emotion; it's perception. The 'supreme yogi' is supreme precisely because they've transcended the limitation of partial empathy while retaining—indeed, expanding—compassionate seeing."

Sadhak: "How does this equality-vision help in practical life? If I see everyone's pleasure and pain as equal, won't I become confused about who to help first?"

Guru: "Equality-vision is about inner stance, not practical priority. You still respond to immediate needs—the drowning child before the distant famine. But your inner motivation becomes pure: you're not helping because this is 'my' child or 'my' country; you're helping because suffering is suffering and you respond to what's in front of you. The vision of equality actually clarifies action because it removes the confusion of preferential attachment. You simply do what's needed, where you are, without the overlay of 'is this person important enough for my help?'"

Sadhak: "What about others' happiness? If I see their happiness as my own, won't I become attached to ensuring their happiness?"

Guru: "The verse includes both 'sukham' and 'duḥkham'—and the yogi sees both equally. This means not becoming attached to others' happiness any more than becoming overwhelmed by their suffering. You recognize their joy without needing to maintain it; you respond to their pain without being destroyed by it. The equality extends to your response as well: measured, appropriate, wise. You're not on a mission to make everyone happy or to solve all suffering—you simply see accurately and respond naturally."

Sadhak: "How do I develop this capacity? It seems so far from where I am now."

Guru: "Begin where you are. When someone tells you their trouble, pause before responding and recognize: 'This feeling is familiar to me. I know what this is like.' When someone shares their joy, let yourself feel: 'This delight—I know this too.' Start with those close to you, then extend gradually. Notice when you withhold empathy—from enemies, from those you judge, from distant sufferers—and deliberately apply 'ātmaupamyena': 'If this were happening to me, how would I feel?' Over time, this deliberate practice becomes natural perception, and natural perception ripens into the supreme yogi's continuous equality-vision."

Did this resonate with you? Share it with someone who needs to hear this.

🌅 Daily Practice

🌅 Morning

Practice 'Ātmaupamya Meditation'—self-analogy meditation. Sit quietly and recall your own experiences: a time of deep happiness, a time of sorrow, a time of fear, a time of hope. Feel each briefly. Then systematically extend: 'This happiness—every being has felt something like this. This sorrow—every being knows this.' Extend to beings you'll encounter today: family, coworkers, strangers on your commute. 'Each of them has felt all of this—joy, grief, fear, love—just as I have.' Finish with the recognition: 'We are more alike than different. What I feel, they feel.' Carry this into your day.

☀️ Daytime

Practice 'Empathy Flashes' throughout the day. When you see anyone—coworker stressed over deadline, cashier going through the motions, driver who cuts you off—take one second to apply ātmaupamya: 'This being, like me, wants to be happy and avoid suffering. What they feel right now, I know too.' This isn't analysis; it's a flash of recognition. The stressed coworker: 'I know what stress feels like.' The tired cashier: 'I know fatigue and monotony.' The aggressive driver: 'I know impatience and the feeling that I'm more important than others.' This recognition transforms your response from judgment to understanding.

🌙 Evening

Reflect on the day's practice with 'Equality Review.' Bring to mind three interactions—one pleasant, one neutral, one difficult. For each, ask: 'Did I see this person's experience as equal to my own? Did I recognize their pleasure/pain as similar to mine?' Where you succeeded, feel gratitude. Where you failed, don't judge—simply recognize: 'In that moment, I forgot equality. I saw them as different, less real than me.' Set intention for tomorrow: 'I will practice seeing all beings' happiness and suffering as equal to my own—not as concept but as lived perception.' Close by holding the image of diverse beings—friends, strangers, enemies, animals—and recognizing: 'One consciousness, experiencing through all.'

Common Questions

This verse seems to describe a psychological impossibility. How can one person genuinely experience the feelings of billions of beings? Our nervous systems aren't connected.
The verse doesn't claim the yogi experiences everyone's emotional content simultaneously—that would indeed be neurologically impossible. Rather, 'ātmaupamyena' (through analogy to oneself) indicates a recognition: 'What I feel, others feel.' This recognition operates moment by moment in actual encounters, not as constant omniscient awareness of all suffering everywhere. When the yogi meets someone suffering, they recognize the nature of that suffering through their own experience. When they contemplate distant beings, they recognize: 'They too experience pleasure and pain as I do.' This is cognitive and perceptual, not mystical nervous-system connection. It's available to anyone willing to genuinely extend their natural self-knowledge to others.
If I truly felt others' pain as my own, wouldn't I be morally obligated to spend all my time alleviating suffering? How could I ever enjoy anything while others suffer?
This concern reveals a misunderstanding of 'samam paśyati'—seeing equally. The yogi sees both pleasure and pain equally, which means neither attaching to pleasure nor drowning in pain. The supreme yogi is not paralyzed by universal suffering; they're freed from attachment to both suffering and pleasure. They respond to suffering when they encounter it, but they don't cease all activity until all suffering ends—that's an impossible standard that would prevent any action. Moreover, trying to eliminate all suffering often creates more suffering (through burnout, codependence, misguided intervention). The yogi acts from wisdom, not from guilt. They do what they can, where they are, and accept what's beyond their power without anguish.
Doesn't this 'equality vision' potentially enable detachment from injustice? If all suffering is equal, why fight against particular injustices?
Equality-vision is about inner perception, not outer response. The yogi sees that suffering is suffering whether it affects one person or millions, rich or poor, near or far. This doesn't create passive acceptance of injustice—quite the opposite. Because preferential attachment is removed ('this suffering matters because it affects my group'), the yogi can see injustice more clearly and respond more effectively. They fight injustice not from anger or tribal loyalty but from clear perception that it causes suffering. Many great social reformers have operated from something like this vision: responding to systemic injustice because suffering is suffering, not because 'these are my people.' The vision of equality, properly understood, is the foundation of justice.