Gita 5.8

Karma Sanyasa Yoga

नैव किञ्चित्करोमीति युक्तो मन्येत तत्त्ववित् | पश्यञ्श्रृण्वन्स्पृशञ्जिघ्रन्नश्नन्गच्छन्स्वपञ्श्वसन् ||८||

naiva kiñcit karomīti yukto manyeta tattva-vit | paśyañ śṛṇvan spṛśañ jighran aśnan gacchan svapañ śvasan ||8||

In essence: The knower of truth witnesses life's endless activities—seeing, hearing, touching—while knowing with absolute certainty: 'I do nothing at all.'

A conversation between a seeker and guide to help you feel this verse deeply

Sadhak-Guru Dialogue

Sadhak: "Guruji, this verse seems to deny ordinary experience. Right now I'm clearly seeing you, hearing you, breathing. How can I think 'I do nothing'?"

Guru: "The activities you list—are you doing them, or are they happening? Did you decide to see me, or did sight happen when your eyes opened and I was in view?"

Sadhak: "Well, seeing just... happened. I opened my eyes and there you were."

Guru: "And did you decide to open your eyes? Or did the impulse to open them arise on its own?"

Sadhak: "I... I suppose I decided to. Didn't I?"

Guru: "Look carefully. When you made that 'decision,' were you the author of it, or did the decision simply appear in consciousness? Can you find the moment when 'you' created the decision, or do you only find the decision already formed, being witnessed?"

Sadhak: "This is confusing. It feels like I decide things, but when I look closely, decisions seem to just happen."

Guru: "Exactly. The sense of 'I' doing comes after the activity, as a claim of ownership. The activity happens through the body-mind organism, and then thought claims: 'I did that.' The tattva-vit sees through this mechanism. Activities continue; the false claim of doership stops."

Sadhak: "But without a sense of being the doer, wouldn't I become passive, unable to act?"

Guru: "Did the sun become passive when it stopped believing it was a person? It still shines, burns, gives life. You won't become passive; you'll become efficient. Right now, much of your energy goes into maintaining the illusion of doership, worrying about results, comparing yourself to others. When that drops, the same energy is available for life to flow through you unimpeded."

Sadhak: "What about responsibility? If 'I' don't do anything, am I not responsible for my actions?"

Guru: "The body-mind continues to function according to its conditioning and the influences upon it. Society can still hold the organism accountable; consequences still follow actions. What changes is the psychological suffering that comes from personal doership—the guilt, the pride, the anxiety about outcomes. Responsibility in the practical sense remains; the suffering-generating sense of being a separate agent responsible for controlling the universe disappears."

Sadhak: "Why does Krishna list such ordinary activities—seeing, hearing, eating, sleeping? Why not more significant actions?"

Guru: "Because the illusion of doership operates even in the most basic functions. If you can see through it there, you'll see through it everywhere. We imagine we're the authors of grand decisions while overlooking that we couldn't even author a single breath. Start with breathing—are you doing it, or is it happening? When you see that even breathing isn't 'your' action, what action could be?"

Did this resonate with you? Share it with someone who needs to hear this.

🌅 Daily Practice

🌅 Morning

Begin with 'witnessing the witness' meditation. Sit quietly and notice the activities occurring without any effort on your part: breathing happening, heart beating, sounds appearing, thoughts arising. You're not doing any of these—they're simply occurring in awareness. Now notice: even 'being aware' isn't something you're doing; awareness is simply present. Ask yourself: 'If I'm not doing the breathing, the hearing, the thinking—what am I actually doing?' Sit with this question without rushing to answer. Notice any resistance—the ego's claim 'But I AM doing things!' Simply witness that claim as another thought arising. Set an intention: 'Today, I will notice activities happening through this body-mind, and I will question my assumption that I am doing them.'

☀️ Daytime

Practice the 'who is doing?' inquiry throughout the day. When you find yourself in any activity from Krishna's list—seeing, hearing, touching, smelling, eating, walking—pause and ask: 'Who is doing this?' Not philosophically, but experientially. When eating, look: is there an 'I' eating, or is eating simply happening while 'I' is a thought added on? When walking, investigate: am I walking the legs, or are the legs walking while the sense of 'I' comes along for the ride? This isn't about producing a particular experience but about honest inquiry. Notice especially when anxiety arises around doing things 'right'—this reveals where the illusion of doership is strongest. In those moments, question: 'If I'm not really the doer, whose failure or success is this?'

🌙 Evening

Review the day through the lens of doership. Recall three activities you performed. For each, investigate honestly: Did I author this action, or did it happen through me? Could I locate the moment when 'I' initiated it, or did I only find myself already in motion? Notice: taking credit for activities feels as absurd as taking credit for your heartbeat once you see clearly. Yet also notice: appropriate action happened, responsibilities were met, life functioned. The absence of a true doer didn't create paralysis. End with a contemplation: 'All day, seeing happened, hearing happened, breathing happened. And throughout it all, I—the imagined author—was never there. Only awareness, witnessing the play of life through this form.' Let sleep come not as something you do but as something that happens to the body while you—awareness—remain present even as the mind dissolves into dreams.

Common Questions

This teaching seems to deny free will. If 'I' don't do anything, do I have no choice in life? Am I just a robot?

The teaching doesn't deny choice; it questions who or what is choosing. Choices continue to happen—the organism weighs options, considers consequences, and actions follow. What's questioned is whether there's a separate 'self' behind the process, controlling it. When you carefully observe a moment of choice, you find: considerations arise, a decision emerges, action follows. Nowhere in this sequence can you find a 'you' separate from the process, pulling the strings. This doesn't make you a robot; it reveals that you never were the controller you imagined. Freedom isn't in the imaginary controller but in the recognition that the whole process is spontaneously intelligent, that life knows how to live itself through you. Paradoxically, this recognition feels more free than the burdened sense of being a separate decider who might decide wrongly.

If the sage truly thinks 'I do nothing,' how can they function in the world? Don't you need a sense of agency to accomplish anything?

Here's the crucial distinction: the sage doesn't think 'nothing happens' but 'I do nothing.' Activities continue vigorously—perhaps more vigorously, since energy isn't wasted on the exhausting maintenance of a separate self-sense. A river doesn't need to believe it's a separate agent to flow powerfully to the sea; its nature is to flow. Similarly, the sage's nature expresses through action without the overlay of personal doership. Studies of expert performers—athletes, musicians, surgeons—reveal that peak performance correlates with absence of self-consciousness, with 'flow states' where the sense of a separate doer disappears. The teaching isn't that nothing functions without an 'I' but that functioning is actually smoother without one.

This sounds like a form of dissociation or depersonalization, which is a psychological disorder. Is this teaching mentally unhealthy?

Excellent observation—there's an important distinction. Pathological depersonalization is characterized by distress, by feeling disconnected from one's body and actions in a way that causes suffering and impairs function. What Krishna describes is the opposite: a recognition that brings peace, clarity, and enhanced engagement with life. In depersonalization, the sense of unreality is unwanted and frightening; in this recognition, the seeing-through of the illusory self is liberating. The difference lies in whether the shift is forced by trauma or arrived at through understanding, and whether it produces suffering or freedom. Many spiritual practitioners have both experiences at different times; the healthy one is marked by peace and presence, the unhealthy by anxiety and disconnection. If this teaching produces distress rather than relief, step back and cultivate stability before pursuing it further.

← Verse 5.7 Verse 5.9 →