GitaChapter 5Verse 22

Gita 5.22

Karma Sanyasa Yoga

ये हि संस्पर्शजा भोगा दुःखयोनय एव ते | आद्यन्तवन्तः कौन्तेय न तेषु रमते बुधः ||२२||

ye hi saṁsparśajā bhogā duḥkha-yonaya eva te | ādyantavantaḥ kaunteya na teṣu ramate budhaḥ ||22||

In essence: Every pleasure born from external contact carries within it the seed of its own sorrow--the wise see through this deception and refuse to build their house on shifting sand.

A conversation between a seeker and guide to help you feel this verse deeply

Sadhak-Guru Dialogue

Sadhak: "But pleasure feels so good in the moment. How can something that brings joy be called a 'womb of sorrow'?"

Guru: "Does it feel good, or does it feel like relief? Examine carefully. When you eat delicious food when hungry, is the pleasure in the food itself, or in the temporary cessation of hunger? When hunger returns, you're back where you started--or worse, because now you know what you're missing."

Sadhak: "But some pleasures seem purely positive--listening to beautiful music, watching a sunset. These don't come from any lack."

Guru: "And when the music stops? When the sun has set? Notice what happens in your mind. There's a subtle reaching--'more, again, don't go.' This reaching IS suffering beginning. The sunset hasn't caused sorrow; your relationship to it--demanding it continue, mourning its passing--that's where sorrow gestates. The wise enjoy the sunset fully precisely because they don't grasp."

Sadhak: "So we should just not enjoy anything? That sounds like a joyless existence."

Guru: "The opposite. The teaching says 'na ramate'--the wise don't delight IN them, meaning they don't place their delight INSIDE these experiences as if the experiences were containers of happiness. They can enjoy a sunset more completely than a grasping person because they're not polluting the experience with anxiety about its ending. True enjoyment requires freedom from need."

Sadhak: "This seems theoretical. In practice, how do I stop finding pleasure in pleasurable things?"

Guru: "You don't stop finding pleasure--you stop seeking happiness there. There's a crucial difference. Pleasure happens; that's biology. But placing your wellbeing, your okayness, your fundamental happiness on the arrival of pleasure and the avoidance of its departure--that's optional, and that's what creates suffering. The wise let pleasure come and go like weather, while remaining rooted in something stable."

Sadhak: "What is this 'something stable'? It sounds abstract."

Guru: "It's actually the most concrete thing there is--more concrete than sensations, which constantly shift. It's your own aware presence, which is there during pleasure and pain alike, unchanged. The mountain doesn't feel better when the sun shines on it or worse when clouds gather. Find your mountain-nature, and weather becomes just weather."

Sadhak: "But I'm human, not a mountain. Isn't this asking me to be something I'm not?"

Guru: "You're asking to be something you already are but have forgotten. The mountain-nature isn't something to achieve but to recognize. Right now, as we speak, there's an aware presence hearing these words--that presence isn't disturbed by the content. Find what's already stable, and you'll stop desperately needing pleasure to 'make' you stable."

Sadhak: "If pleasures have beginning and end, do sorrows also end? At least that's some comfort."

Guru: "Yes, contact-born sorrows also end. But here's the trap: the ending of sorrow feels like pleasure! So you're back on the wheel--pleasure ending causes sorrow, sorrow ending feels like pleasure, and round you go. The wise step off the wheel entirely, not by eliminating experiences but by finding what's always present beneath the spinning."

Did this resonate with you? Share it with someone who needs to hear this.

🌅 Daily Practice

🌅 Morning

Begin with a 'pleasure audit.' Identify 2-3 pleasures you're anticipating today--a meal, a meeting, entertainment. For each, acknowledge: 'This will come and go. It has beginning and end.' Then locate your deeper intention: 'Today, I will enjoy what comes without needing it to complete me.' Set a clear intention: 'The pleasures of today are welcome guests, not necessary foundations. My okayness doesn't depend on their arrival or suffer from their departure.' This isn't renunciation but freedom.

☀️ Daytime

When experiencing pleasure--any contact-born enjoyment--practice 'awake enjoyment.' Instead of losing yourself in the experience, add a layer of witnessing: 'This is pleasant. I'm aware of this pleasantness.' Notice how the awareness itself is untouched by the pleasure, neither elevated nor diminished. When the pleasure passes (the meal ends, the experience concludes), notice any grasping: 'More, again, don't stop.' Don't fight the grasping--just see it. Ask: 'Is the awareness suffering, or just the grasping mind?' This creates space between you and your reactions.

🌙 Evening

Review the day's pleasures and their aftermath. Which left you wanting more? Which produced subtle anxiety or dissatisfaction after ending? Notice the pattern: contact-born pleasure inherently produces this aftermath because it requires conditions that cannot be maintained. For each pleasure, trace it back: 'This required sense organs, sense objects, and their contact--three unstable elements.' Then locate what was stable throughout: your witnessing presence. Rest in that stability. Before sleep: 'Tomorrow's pleasures and sorrows will come and go. I remain. Let me sleep in what remains, not in what passes.'

Common Questions

If sensory pleasures are sources of sorrow, why did God create them? Why are we wired to enjoy them?
Sensory pleasures aren't mistakes--they're teachers. They point toward something real: the bliss that is our nature. But they're pointers, not destinations. A signpost saying 'Paris' isn't Paris. The pleasure in music hints at an inner harmony; pleasure in beauty hints at the beauty of consciousness itself. Evolution wired us for survival through pleasure/pain; spirituality uses that wiring as a starting point, then reveals something beyond survival--flourishing in being itself. The problem isn't the creation of pleasure but mistaking the finger pointing at the moon for the moon itself.
Successful people seem to pursue and achieve pleasures constantly, and they seem happy. Is this teaching only for renunciates?
Observe more carefully. Many 'successful' people are running on a hedonic treadmill--achieving pleasures, briefly satisfied, then needing more. Their 'happiness' often depends entirely on continued success; the moment it stops, they're devastated. The truly fulfilled among the successful--and there are some--have typically found something beyond achievement-pleasure: meaning, contribution, presence. The teaching isn't for renunciates alone but for anyone who has noticed that getting what they want doesn't produce lasting satisfaction. That noticing is the beginning of wisdom.
If I stop seeking pleasure, won't I lose motivation? What will drive me to do anything?
You'll lose desperate motivation, anxiety-driven motivation--and good riddance. What remains is cleaner: you act because action is appropriate, because creation is natural, because contribution feels right--not because you're trying to fill a hole. Often, people freed from pleasure-seeking become MORE creative and productive, not less, because they're not exhausting energy on anxiety about outcomes. The shift is from 'I need this to be okay' to 'I'm already okay, so let me engage fully.' From that foundation, action becomes play rather than desperate scrambling.