GitaChapter 16Verse 12

Gita 16.12

Daivasura Sampad Vibhaga Yoga

आशापाशशतैर्बद्धाः कामक्रोधपरायणाः | ईहन्ते कामभोगार्थमन्यायेनार्थसञ्चयान् ||१२||

āśā-pāśa-śatair baddhāḥ kāma-krodha-parāyaṇāḥ | īhante kāma-bhogārtham anyāyenārtha-sañcayān ||12||

In essence: Bound by hundreds of nooses of expectation, enslaved to desire and anger, they strive for wealth by unjust means—all to fuel the endless pursuit of sense enjoyment.

A conversation between a seeker and guide to help you feel this verse deeply

Sadhak-Guru Dialogue

Sadhak: "The image of hundreds of nooses is terrifying. How do hopes become traps?"

Guru: "Every expectation creates a bond to a specific future. 'If this happens, I will be happy.' That expectation is a noose—if it comes true, you are bound to maintaining it; if it does not, you are bound to suffering its absence. Multiply this by hundreds of desires, and you understand the binding. Each hope pulls consciousness in a different direction."

Sadhak: "But isn't hope a good thing? Don't we need hope to survive?"

Guru: "There are different kinds of hope. Hope rooted in trust in the Divine, hope for growth, hope that inspires action without attachment—these are liberating. Hope for specific sense objects, hope that creates anxiety if unfulfilled, hope that binds happiness to external outcomes—these are the nooses. The question is: does your hope free you or bind you?"

Sadhak: "What is the connection between desire and anger here?"

Guru: "They are two sides of one coin. Desire reaches out to grasp; when thwarted, it transforms into anger that wants to destroy the obstacle. Watch this in yourself: when you want something badly and cannot get it, notice what arises. First frustration, then irritation, then anger. The demoniac are parāyaṇāḥ—devoted—to this cycle. It rules them completely."

Sadhak: "And anyāyena—unjust means—is the result?"

Guru: "Inevitably. When desire is paramount and anger serves it, ethics become inconvenient restrictions. The demoniac mind reasons: 'I need this wealth to enjoy; the method doesn't matter as long as I succeed.' This logic produces exploitation, fraud, violence. Notice: they strive for wealth not as an end but 'kāma-bhogārtham'—for desire-enjoyment. Wealth is just the means to the true goal: more pleasure. And that goal knows no ethical bounds."

Did this resonate with you? Share it with someone who needs to hear this.

🌅 Daily Practice

🌅 Morning

Count your nooses: 'What expectations am I carrying today? What hopes bind me to specific outcomes?' This is not to eliminate hope but to see which ones create bondage. For each binding hope, ask: 'Can I hold this lightly? Can I be at peace even if it doesn't happen?' Practice releasing the grip without rejecting appropriate action.

☀️ Daytime

Watch the kāma-krodha cycle: desire arises, obstacles appear, frustration transforms to anger. See this in small moments throughout the day—traffic, delays, uncooperative people. Each instance is a miniature of the larger pattern. In that seeing, interrupt the cycle: desire need not become anger when held with wisdom.

🌙 Evening

Examine your economic life: 'How do I earn and spend? Is any of it 'anyāyena'—unjust, harmful, exploitative?' This requires honest scrutiny—not harsh judgment but clear seeing. If you find problematic patterns, consider gradual change toward more dharmic livelihood. End with gratitude that awareness allows transformation.

Common Questions

Is wealth itself the problem, or only wealth acquired unjustly?
Wealth acquired righteously, used for dharmic purposes, and held without attachment is not problematic. The issue here is threefold: (1) anyāyena—acquisition by unjust means, (2) kāma-bhogārtham—for the purpose of sense enjoyment rather than higher goals, and (3) the underlying bondage to desire that drives it. Wealth in itself is neutral; the orientation toward it determines its effect on consciousness.
How do I distinguish healthy ambition from the striving described here?
Healthy ambition can exist with ethical means, contentment with whatever comes, and goals that serve more than personal pleasure. The striving described here is (1) bound by hundreds of expectations, (2) governed by desire and anger, and (3) willing to use unjust means. If your ambition allows for ethical conduct, equanimity about outcomes, and goals beyond self-enjoyment, it is fundamentally different.
What if society rewards this behavior? Is this teaching impractical?
Society often does reward demoniac behavior in the short term—wealth, power, apparent success. But examine the long-term consequences: inner torment, broken relationships, destroyed health, eventual karmic consequences, and death with no spiritual attainment. The teaching is supremely practical—it points to what actually leads to well-being versus what appears to but does not. True practicality considers all consequences, not just immediate gains.