GitaChapter 1Verse 38

Gita 1.38

Arjuna Vishada Yoga

यद्यप्येते न पश्यन्ति लोभोपहतचेतसः । कुलक्षयकृतं दोषं मित्रद्रोहे च पातकम् ॥३८॥

yady apy ete na paśyanti lobhopahata-cetasaḥ kula-kṣaya-kṛtaṁ doṣaṁ mitra-drohe ca pātakam

In essence: Greed blinds the greedy, but their blindness does not excuse those who can see—seeing clearly carries its own burden of responsibility.

A conversation between a seeker and guide to help you feel this verse deeply

Sadhak-Guru Dialogue

Sadhak: "Arjuna seems to be judging the Kauravas—calling them greedy, saying they can't see the sin."

Guru: "Notice he isn't condemning them—he's describing their condition as one would describe a disease. 'Lobhopahata-cetasaḥ'—their minds are overpowered, afflicted. There's almost compassion in this diagnosis. They didn't choose to become blind; greed infected them."

Sadhak: "So greed is like an illness that destroys moral vision?"

Guru: "Precisely. The Gita treats moral failings more like psychological conditions than personal evils. Duryodhana isn't demonic; he's sick. His desire for kingdom has so consumed him that he cannot process the reality of what he's doing. Have you never been so caught up in wanting something that you didn't notice the harm you were causing?"

Sadhak: "Yes... when I was fighting for that promotion, I didn't see how I was neglecting my family until my daughter told me she didn't know me anymore."

Guru: "That's 'lobhopahata-cetasaḥ'—ambition had clouded your perception. You weren't evil; you were temporarily blind. The Kauravas' condition is the same, just more extreme and more prolonged."

Sadhak: "But if they're blind, aren't they less guilty than Arjuna who can see?"

Guru: "This is exactly Arjuna's dilemma! He's realizing that his clarity of vision may actually increase his responsibility. If he fights knowing fully what it means, his karma is different from theirs. The ignorant soldier and the aware soldier perform the same act, but the inner meaning is different."

Sadhak: "So wisdom is actually a burden?"

Guru: "It is both gift and burden. The more you see, the more you are responsible for what you see. This is why many people unconsciously avoid clarity—they sense that seeing truly will demand something of them. Arjuna's crisis is partly the crisis of one who cannot unsee what he has seen."

Sadhak: "That's uncomfortable. Sometimes I wish I didn't see certain things—problems at work, issues in relationships."

Guru: "And yet you cannot unfind what you have found. This is why the Gita is necessary—it teaches how to bear the weight of vision, how to act from clarity without being crushed by it. But first, like Arjuna, you must fully acknowledge the weight."

Sadhak: "What about people who genuinely don't see—not from greed but just from lack of exposure or education?"

Guru: "Their karma is different. The universe is not unjust—it measures each according to their capacity. What is sin for the wise may be forgivable in the ignorant. But this is why wisdom traditions emphasize compassion: the awakened understand that most beings are asleep, and judge them accordingly."

Did this resonate with you? Share it with someone who needs to hear this.

🌅 Daily Practice

🌅 Morning

Begin the day by honestly examining where greed might be clouding your own vision. Ask: 'Is there something I want so badly that I might be ignoring its costs?' This is not self-judgment but self-diagnosis—catching the disease before it spreads.

☀️ Daytime

When you notice someone acting in ways that seem obviously wrong to you, pause before judgment. Consider: 'What desire might be blinding them? What would I have to want to not see what they don't see?' This creates compassion without condoning the behavior.

🌙 Evening

Reflect on any moments today when you 'saw' something clearly—a problem, a truth, an injustice—that others seemed blind to. Ask yourself: 'What responsibility does my seeing create? If I see and don't act, what does that mean?' Let the question sit without rushing to answer it.

Common Questions

If the Kauravas can't help being greedy, how can they be held responsible for their actions?
The Gita holds a nuanced position: while immediate moral blindness may reduce culpability in the moment, the cultivation of greed that led to blindness was itself a choice made over time. Duryodhana was not always this way—his greed grew through repeated indulgence. He is responsible not for this moment's blindness but for the lifetime of choices that created it. Similarly, each of us is responsible for the inner states we cultivate, even if in the moment we feel compelled.
Is Arjuna saying that ignorance is an excuse for wrongdoing?
Not exactly. He's saying that those who see clearly have a heavier burden than those who don't. This doesn't excuse the ignorant—the Kauravas will still face consequences for their actions. But Arjuna is realizing that his own potential sin would be greater precisely because he understands what he's doing. Knowledge creates responsibility; it doesn't erase the consequences of others' ignorance.
What's the difference between 'doṣam' (fault) and 'pātakam' (sin)?
'Doṣam' refers to defect, flaw, or wrongness—something that is objectively harmful regardless of intent. 'Pātakam' means that which causes one to fall—sin with karmic consequences. Family destruction is a 'doṣam'—an objective wrong. Betraying friends is a 'pātakam'—a sin that degrades the perpetrator. Arjuna uses both terms to show that the Kauravas' actions are wrong both objectively and subjectively, cosmically and personally.