GitaChapter 1Verse 37

Gita 1.37

Arjuna Vishada Yoga

तस्मान्नार्हा वयं हन्तुं धार्तराष्ट्रान्स्वबान्धवान् । स्वजनं हि कथं हत्वा सुखिनः स्याम माधव ॥३७॥

tasmān nārhā vayaṁ hantuṁ dhārtarāṣṭrān svabāndhavān svajanaṁ hi kathaṁ hatvā sukhinaḥ syāma mādhava

In essence: Killing family may win a kingdom, but it guarantees losing the only thing that makes kingdoms worth having—the capacity for happiness.

A conversation between a seeker and guide to help you feel this verse deeply

Sadhak-Guru Dialogue

Sadhak: "Arjuna keeps asking about happiness. Isn't that selfish? He should think about dharma, not personal happiness."

Guru: "An excellent challenge. But consider: if a soldier wins every battle and returns home unable to love, unable to laugh, unable to sleep—has he truly won? Arjuna is asking whether any victory is worth the inner destruction it might cause."

Sadhak: "But sometimes duty requires sacrifice of happiness. Isn't that part of being a warrior?"

Guru: "True, but Arjuna isn't avoiding sacrifice—he's questioning whether this particular sacrifice serves any greater good. If killing his family makes him permanently miserable, and that misery makes him a worse king, husband, father—who benefits? The calculus is not simple."

Sadhak: "So he's worried about his future effectiveness, not just his feelings?"

Guru: "Exactly. A broken man cannot protect the kingdom he has won. What good is a throne if the one who sits on it is haunted? Arjuna intuits that sustainable leadership requires sustainable psychology."

Sadhak: "I've felt this. I got the promotion I wanted, but I had to step on a colleague to get it. I can't enjoy it."

Guru: "And your inability to enjoy it—is that a weakness or a message? Perhaps your soul is telling you that the victory was not worth its cost. This is precisely Arjuna's wisdom in this moment."

Sadhak: "But what's the alternative? Let the Kauravas win? Let evil triumph?"

Guru: "You are thinking in binaries: either Arjuna fights miserably or evil wins. Krishna will offer a third path—action without the attachment that creates misery. But we are not there yet. First, Arjuna must fully feel the impossibility of the situation."

Sadhak: "So sitting in the impossibility is part of the path?"

Guru: "It is the beginning of the path. Most people rush to solutions before truly inhabiting the problem. Arjuna's greatness is that he pauses, trembles, questions, grieves. Only then does Krishna speak. The Gita begins with a man who has stopped pretending things are simple."

Sadhak: "I usually rush to solutions. Maybe I need to sit with problems longer?"

Guru: "Try it. Before the next difficult decision, instead of immediately asking 'What should I do?' ask 'What is really at stake here? What makes this hard?' Let the question breathe. The answer that eventually comes will have more depth."

Did this resonate with you? Share it with someone who needs to hear this.

🌅 Daily Practice

🌅 Morning

Today, before making any decision, ask yourself: 'If I succeed in this, what will it cost me internally?' Practice distinguishing between goals that create sustainable satisfaction and those that lead to hollow victories. Write down one goal you're pursuing and honestly assess whether achieving it will make you capable of happiness.

☀️ Daytime

Notice any moments when you feel pressure to 'win' at the expense of relationships. When you catch this, pause and ask: 'Is this victory worth the connection it might cost?' Sometimes the answer is yes, sometimes no. The practice is the asking, not any particular answer.

🌙 Evening

Reflect on your closest relationships. Are there any 'cold wars' where you are technically right but relationally wrong? Where you could win the argument but lose the person? Consider whether any of these victories are worth their cost. If not, consider reaching out to repair rather than continuing to win.

Common Questions

Why does Arjuna say 'we' (vayam) are not justified? Isn't this his personal crisis?
Arjuna includes his brothers and allies in his reflection. He's not just speaking of his own moral position but making a collective ethical claim. This reveals his sense of responsibility as a leader—he's not only worried about his own karma but the karma his brothers will incur by following his lead. A true leader considers not just their own soul but the souls of those they lead into action.
What's the difference between 'svabāndhavān' (own kinsmen) and 'svajanam' (own people)?
The repetition with slight variation emphasizes the concentric circles of relationship. 'Svabāndhavān' refers to blood relatives and in-laws—family by birth and marriage. 'Svajanam' is broader—people of one's own community, those with whom one shares identity. Arjuna is saying: it's not just about close family but everyone in the opposing army who shares his culture, history, and values. The destruction is not surgical but civilizational.
Why call Krishna 'Mādhava' here? It seems random.
Mādhava connects Krishna to sweetness (madhu), fortune, and dynasty. Arjuna implicitly appeals to Krishna's own experience of belonging and family pride. It's as if he's saying: 'You who are blessed with the goddess of fortune, who value your lineage—surely you understand why I can't destroy mine.' The name is a subtle emotional argument, not random at all.