Gita 1.35
Arjuna Vishada Yoga
एतान्न हन्तुमिच्छामि घ्नतोऽपि मधुसूदन । अपि त्रैलोक्यराज्यस्य हेतोः किं नु महीकृते ॥३५॥
etān na hantum icchāmi ghnato 'pi madhusūdana api trailokya-rājyasya hetoḥ kiṁ nu mahī-kṛte
In essence: Even when others are ready to kill me, I choose not to kill them—for what is sovereignty over three worlds worth when bought with the blood of those I love?
A conversation between a seeker and guide to help you feel this verse deeply
Sadhak-Guru Dialogue
Sadhak: "Guruji, Arjuna says he won't kill even if they kill him. Isn't self-defense a right? Why surrender it?"
Guru: "Self-defense against strangers is one thing. But can you defend yourself against your grandfather? If your mother attacked you, would you fight back with full force? Arjuna is not making a universal statement about self-defense—he's speaking about this specific situation where the attackers are beloved."
Sadhak: "But if he doesn't fight, the Pandavas lose everything—kingdom, honor, family."
Guru: "Yes. This is the dilemma. If he fights, he loses his teachers and elders through killing them. If he doesn't fight, he loses everything through their victory. There is no option where he doesn't lose. The Gita's task is to change his relationship to loss itself, not to show him a loss-free path."
Sadhak: "He calls Krishna 'Madhusudana'—the demon-slayer. Is he mocking Krishna?"
Guru: "Not mocking—testing. He's saying: 'You killed demons, so you understand justified killing. But surely you can see these are not demons.' It's an implicit argument: 'Your precedent doesn't apply here.' What Arjuna doesn't yet understand is that the demon to be slain is not outside—it's his own confusion."
Sadhak: "The three worlds—is that literal or metaphorical?"
Guru: "In the cosmology of the Mahabharata, quite literal: heaven (svarga), earth (bhumi), and the underworld (patala). But the meaning is 'everything imaginable.' Arjuna is saying: 'You could offer me rule over the entire universe, and I would still refuse to kill my grandfather for it.' This is not a negotiation—it's a total rejection of cost-benefit thinking."
Sadhak: "That sounds enlightened—rejecting worldly gain. So is Arjuna spiritually advanced here?"
Guru: "He looks advanced, but he's actually stuck. True renunciation comes from fullness—seeing through desire because you've realized something greater. Arjuna's renunciation comes from despair—he doesn't want things because everything seems poisoned. The external behavior looks similar; the internal state is completely different. Krishna will help him find action from fullness rather than paralysis from despair."
Sadhak: "So this verse is the very bottom—the lowest point?"
Guru: "Precisely. He has refused everything: victory, kingdom, pleasure, life, cosmic sovereignty. There is nothing left to want. This is the zero point from which the Gita's teaching can begin. You cannot teach someone who thinks they still have options. Arjuna has exhausted all options. Now he's ready to listen."
Sadhak: "I've felt that despair—when nothing seems worth doing."
Guru: "Then you know Arjuna's state. And you also know that from that zero point, something new can emerge—or you can simply collapse. The Gita exists to show the emergence. From 'I don't want anything' can come either depression or liberation. The difference is guidance."
Did this resonate with you? Share it with someone who needs to hear this.
🌅 Daily Practice
Consider your strongest 'I would never' statement—something you believe you would refuse to do regardless of reward. Now examine: is this principle born from wisdom (understanding why it's wrong) or from attachment (it would hurt someone you love)? Arjuna's 'never' comes from attachment, not wisdom. Both can lead to the same behavior; only one leads to freedom.
Today, if you face a conflict where 'winning' would harm a relationship, pause and ask: 'Is victory worth more than connection?' You probably won't face Arjuna's extreme dilemma, but small versions appear constantly—arguments where being right destroys intimacy, competitions where winning wounds friendship. Notice your actual priorities in action.
Write about a time when you chose relationship over achievement, or achievement over relationship. How did it feel afterward? Neither choice is always right—the Gita will not tell Arjuna to simply surrender. But it will teach him to choose consciously rather than from confusion. Reflecting on your past choices builds this consciousness.