GitaChapter 10Verse 27

Gita 10.27

Vibhuti Yoga

उच्चैःश्रवसमश्वानां विद्धि माममृतोद्भवम् । ऐरावतं गजेन्द्राणां नराणां च नराधिपम् ॥

uccaiḥśravasam aśvānāṁ viddhi mām amṛtodbhavam | airāvataṁ gajendrāṇāṁ narāṇāṁ ca narādhipam ||

In essence: From the cosmic churning that yielded immortality itself came the supreme horse; among elephants stands the divine mount of heaven's king; and among humans, whoever bears the weight of leadership - in these peaks of their kinds, recognize the Divine.

A conversation between a seeker and guide to help you feel this verse deeply

Sadhak-Guru Dialogue

Sadhak: "Why these particular beings? A horse, an elephant, a king - they seem like Arjuna's world more than mine."

Guru: "What do all three have in common?"

Sadhak: "They're all powerful? Respected?"

Guru: "Look deeper. What is a horse used for?"

Sadhak: "Travel, war, carrying burdens..."

Guru: "And an elephant?"

Sadhak: "Same things - but bigger. More majestic. They carry kings into battle."

Guru: "And a king?"

Sadhak: "He carries... the responsibility of his people. Oh. They all carry something."

Guru: "Exactly. The supreme horse, the supreme elephant, the supreme human - all are supreme bearers. They carry weight that others cannot. Now - Ucchaisravas was 'amritodbhavam.' What does that mean?"

Sadhak: "Born from the churning for nectar. From that great struggle between devas and asuras."

Guru: "So this supreme bearer emerged from supreme struggle. What might that suggest about your own life?"

Sadhak: "That my capacity to bear comes from my struggles? That I become able to carry more through the churning of my own life?"

Guru: "And that the Divine is present in that process - both the churning and what emerges from it. Now, about the king..."

Sadhak: "I'm not a king. This doesn't apply to me."

Guru: "Are you certain? Is there no domain where you bear responsibility for others? No sphere where your decisions affect more than yourself?"

Sadhak: "Well, my family depends on me. My team at work looks to me for guidance..."

Guru: "So you are 'naradhipa' in your sphere. The scale differs; the principle remains. When you shoulder that responsibility rightly - when you serve those who depend on you rather than exploiting them - Krishna is present in that function. Kingship is not about throne; it's about dharmic bearing of collective weight."

Sadhak: "So leadership itself is a form of spiritual practice?"

Guru: "When practiced as service, as sacred responsibility - yes. This is why Arjuna cannot abandon his duty. The battlefield is his kingdom; his soldiers depend on him. To flee is to abandon divine function."

Did this resonate with you? Share it with someone who needs to hear this.

🌅 Daily Practice

🌅 Morning

Samudra-manthana reflection: Before beginning your day, reflect on current 'churning' in your life - challenges, struggles, difficult situations. Like the cosmic churning, your struggles produce both poison (negativity, pain) and nectar (growth, strength, wisdom). Set intention: 'Today I will look for what is emerging from my struggles - what capacity, what wisdom, what strength is being born?'

☀️ Daytime

Naradhipa practice: Throughout the day, notice wherever you exercise responsibility - as parent, professional, friend, family member. In each such domain, ask: 'Am I bearing this weight as divine service or as ego-burden?' When you make decisions affecting others, pause and ask: 'What would dharmic sovereignty choose here?' Act from service, not self-interest.

🌙 Evening

Weight inventory: Before sleep, review what you 'carried' today - responsibilities, others' needs, difficult situations. Acknowledge each weight honestly. Then offer each to Krishna: 'You are the supreme bearer. I carried these today - perhaps well, perhaps poorly. Tomorrow let me carry them as Your function, not my burden.'

Common Questions

Why does Krishna identify with mythological creatures? Did Ucchaisravas and Airavata actually exist?
Whether these beings exist as described or represent cosmic principles symbolically doesn't change their teaching value. Ucchaisravas represents the pinnacle of what emerges from transformative struggle - the 'churning' of existence that produces both poison and nectar. Airavata represents the bearing of divine responsibility with majesty and wisdom. If you're literalist, accept them as real beings in celestial realms. If you're symbolic, understand them as pointing to qualities. Either way, the teaching applies: divine excellence manifests in supreme capacity to bear, to carry, to serve purpose beyond oneself.
Isn't claiming divinity in kings dangerous? History shows many tyrants claimed divine right.
Krishna doesn't say all kings are divine or that claiming kingship makes one divine. He says He is present as the principle of righteous sovereignty - the function of bearing collective responsibility for welfare. A tyrant is precisely NOT this; a tyrant exploits rather than serves. The true 'naradhipa' protects the weak, upholds dharma, sacrifices personal comfort for collective good. This verse would condemn most historical kings, not endorse them. The divine king is ideal, not typical.
How is any of this relevant to common people who are neither kings nor warriors?
Every person exercises sovereignty somewhere. The parent is 'naradhipa' to their children. The teacher to their students. The manager to their team. Any sphere where your decisions affect others' welfare is your kingdom. The question isn't whether you have domain but whether you exercise responsibility there divinely - with dharma, service, and the willingness to bear weight that others cannot.